[SIPForum-discussion] in REGISTER method can we use Tel URI?

Vijay Badola Vijay.Badola at onmobile.com
Thu Apr 4 11:31:56 UTC 2013


Request URI of SIP Register Request contain domain of the location service for which the
registration is meant (for example, "sip:abc.com")  and as we know, request uri for Register request does not contain User information.
Also SIP Registrar is SIP entity and it will have a sip address.
I have not found written anywhere related to TEL URI in REGISTER request,
But from SIP RFCs, I THINK we SHOULD use SIP URI in Request Uri instead of TEL URI.

,vijay


From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org<mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org> [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scofield
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:45 PM
To: discussion at sipforum.org<mailto:discussion at sipforum.org>
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] in REGISTER method can we use Tel URI?

Hi All,

In register method request URI can we use TEL URI?

Please help me in this regard.

Thanks!!! in Advance.

Regards,
Michael

________________________________

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. Further, this e-mail may contain viruses and all reasonable precaution to minimize the risk arising there from is taken by OnMobile. OnMobile is not liable for any damage sustained by you as a result of any virus in this e-mail. All applicable virus checks should be carried out by you before opening this e-mail or any attachment thereto.
Thank you - OnMobile Global Limited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20130404/0cc9a796/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list