[SIPForum-discussion] Regarding CRLF

[Prem chandiran]

Hi vijay,
Thanks for your reply my concern is at the end of sdp . For example

v=0©®
                 05
o=Tesla 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 lab.high-voltage.org©®      59
s=Phone Call©®
            14
c=IN IP4 100.101.102.103©®
      26
t=0 0©®
                07
m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 0©®
 25
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000©®
    22
*©®
                     2*

whether the last CRLF should be taken for content-length or it can be
skipped.
Whether the content-length should be 158 or 160

i am facing this issue with only one specific UA. That one UA is informing
that content-length must be 160 where as other UA which inculdes
xlite,eyebeam few more UA's are ok with content-length 158.

Regards,
 Prem Chandiran


On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Vijay Tiwari <vijay11tiwari at gmail.com>wrote:

> Content-Length: 158
>
> LINE TOTAL
> v=0©®
>                    05
> o=Tesla 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 lab.high-voltage.org©®      59
> s=Phone Call©®
>             14
> c=IN IP4 100.101.102.103©®
>       26
> t=0 0©®
>                   07
> m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 0©®
>    25
> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000©®
>     22
>
>                        Total SDP length 158
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Prem chandiran <toprem.m at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>  Hi All,
>> when framing content-length whether CRLF character after sdp should also
>> be taken into consideration?, for example actual length of sdp is 283 and
>> CRLF length is 2 means what should be the content length   whether its 283
>> or 285? if there is any draft/rfc available for the please let me know.I
>> kindly request you all to help me in this.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Prem Chandiran
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> They can because they think they can.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20120929/456a0048/attachment-0002.html>