[SIPForum-discussion] Issue to use Tag

mahesh b mahesh.b.2487 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 27 18:09:28 UTC 2012


http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3665...Refer to section 3.8

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Kareena K <kareenaf1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>   Thanks to all of you.
>
> Today i am stuck in CANCEL METHOD. My server showing the remote tag
> different from the initial remote tag.
> I need your help in this,can anyone please send me the logs of cancel
> method,
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Spencer Wood <
> spencer.wood at alternativenetworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Isn’t the to-tag/from-tag used by the sending/receiving devices to route
>> the call correctly, as the call-id could increment up in value if for
>> instance a call is transferred and this is done by the re-invite, the
>> call-id will count up by one?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:
>> discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Kareena K
>> *Sent:* 26 September 2012 07:28
>>
>> *To:* discussion at sipforum.org
>> *Subject:* [SIPForum-discussion] Issue to use Tag****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Hi all,****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> why tag(i.e to-tag and from-tag) had been used if we can identity the
>> call by using Call-id.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20120927/5b9709a9/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list