[SIPForum-discussion] Transaction Stateful Proxy

[Abhisek Acharya]

ohh yes I am sorry that is Maxforwards....should get decreased by a value 1.



On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:46 PM, tester voip <tester.voip1 at gmail.com>wrote:

> just a smal corectn.
> it should be max-orward rather than C-Seq.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Abhisek Acharya <
> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> there are a lot of call processing scenarios you can test ....
>>
>>
>> check RFC 3261 for that for a better insite
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Abhisek Acharya <
>> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> well first of all send a initial INVITE with a To-tag.Proxy should
>>> reject it if not a MUST.
>>>
>>> 2.Proxy can send CANCEL upon timer expiry.
>>> 3.Make a call and check the C-seq ..it should decrease by a value 1.
>>> 4
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Keerthi Srinivasan <
>>> keerthivarmansrinivasan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone help me in testing Transaction Stateful Proxy?
>>>>
>>>> What are the scenario we can test?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Keerthi
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20121219/97252c73/attachment-0002.html>