[SIPForum-discussion] Finall what codec they are using..
Saurabh Shah
saurabh.shah at matrixcomsec.com
Sat Dec 15 10:36:07 UTC 2012
sdp1 & sdp2 should have atleast one common codec. Otherwise call must be
ended with 488 not acceptable.
Same thing is apply to sdp2 & sdp 3.
If your controller is having transcoding facility, codec between
A-controller and controller-B can be different.
But it do not have such facility, both A & B must have atleast one common
codec to establish a call.
Regards,
Saurabh Shah
_____
From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Raees Shaikh
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 7:46 AM
To: vijay kant gupta
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Finall what codec they are using..
I would think it should either allocate a transcoder or the call should fail
Regards
Raees
On Dec 10, 2012 3:51 AM, "vijay kant gupta" <vijaykant.it2002 at gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Can any body suggest Finally Call setp with which Common SDP. .
Or it need correction.. last 200 Ok should contain Sdp3.
A Controller B
|(1) INVITE bh sdp1 | |
|<------------------| |
|(2) 200 sdp2 | |
|------------------>| |
| |(3) INVITE sdp2 |
| |------------------>|
|(4) ACK | |
|<------------------| |
| |(5) 200 OK sdp3 |
| |<------------------|
| |(6) ACK |
| |------------------>|
|(7) INVITE sdp3 | |
|<------------------| |
|(8) 200 OK sdp2 | |
|------------------>| |
|(9) ACK | |
|<------------------| |
|(10) RTP | |
|.......................................|
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20121215/97d270cc/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list