[SIPForum-discussion] Finall what codec they are using..

Raees Shaikh captainraees at gmail.com
Tue Dec 11 02:15:42 UTC 2012


I would think it should either allocate a transcoder or the call should fail

Regards
Raees
On Dec 10, 2012 3:51 AM, "vijay kant gupta" <vijaykant.it2002 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Hi Can any body suggest Finally Call setp with which Common SDP. .
> Or it need correction.. last 200 Ok should contain Sdp3.
>
>
>              A              Controller               B
>              |(1) INVITE bh sdp1 |                   |
>              |<------------------|                   |
>              |(2) 200 sdp2       |                   |
>              |------------------>|                   |
>              |                   |(3) INVITE sdp2    |
>              |                   |------------------>|
>              |(4) ACK            |                   |
>              |<------------------|                   |
>              |                   |(5) 200 OK sdp3    |
>              |                   |<------------------|
>              |                   |(6) ACK            |
>              |                   |------------------>|
>              |(7) INVITE sdp3    |                   |
>              |<------------------|                   |
>              |(8) 200 OK sdp2    |                   |
>              |------------------>|                   |
>              |(9) ACK            |                   |
>              |<------------------|                   |
>              |(10) RTP           |                   |
>              |.......................................|
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20121211/d10ebf01/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list