[SIPForum-discussion] Diversion Header Syntax
HM Kias
hmkias at gmail.com
Fri Sep 9 09:54:52 UTC 2011
Hi Mustafa,
You are following the syntax (
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-levy-sip-diversion-08.txt), should be OK.
Regards,
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:23 PM, mustafa aydin <mustafaydin82 at yahoo.com>wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone tell if the format of the Diversion header below is an
> acceptable one, if so how can I prove it with RFCs?
> <sip:xxxxxx at 84.44.72.6 <xxxxxx at 84.44.72.6>
> >;reason=unconditional;privacy=full;screen=no
>
> My concern regarding this format is that if there must be quotes around
> the full and no values, because as per the RFC,the syntax is as below, but
> I found many implementations where there are no quotes around.
>
> **** **
> Diversion = "Diversion" ":" 1# (name-addr *( ";" diversion_params ))
> diversion-params = diversion-reason | diversion-counter |****
> diversion-limit | diversion-privacy |****
> diversion-screen | diversion-extension****
> diversion-reason = "reason" "="****
> ( "unknown" | "user-busy" | "no-answer" |****
> "unavailable" | "unconditional" |****
> "time-of-day" | "do-not-disturb" |****
> "deflection" | "follow-me" |****
> "out-of-service" | "away" |****
> token | quoted-string )****
> diversion-counter = "counter" "=" 1*2DIGIT****
> diversion-limit = "limit" "=" 1*2DIGIT****
> diversion-privacy = "privacy" "=" ( "full" | "name" |****
> "uri" | "off" | token | quoted-string )****
> diversion-screen = "screen" "=" ( "yes" | "no" | token |****
> quoted-string )****
> diversion-extension = token ["=" (token | quoted-string)]****
> .
> Thanks is in advance
> Mustafa AYDIN
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
--
HM Kias
91-9443467600
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20110909/4bc92ba2/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list