[SIPForum-discussion] Case Study on Voi p Testinn Solution

[Fatine Taoufik]

Hi,

 

Look at ETSI TS 102 027-2 V3.1.1 (2004-11).

 

Tests can be automatically executed.

 

BR

 

Taoufik 

________________________________

De : discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] De la part de Amit Limaye
Envoyé : mercredi 1 juin 2011 08:12
À : discussion at sipforum.org"
Objet : [SIPForum-discussion] Case Study on Voi p Testinn Solution

 

Hi all 

 

 

I run a software services company 

 

Does any body have a case study on voip client / server testing ...? 

 

 It can be mostly on Manual testing on SIP client .

 

 

Regards

Amit 

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Maciej Wasiel <Maciej.Wasiel at dialogic.com>
To: 'Sijit Nair' <sijit.nair at gmail.com>
Cc: "discussion at sipforum.org" <discussion at sipforum.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Fax Problem

Hi,

There is nothing wrong with the call setup. The fax call is G.711 pass-through, which you can tell from the re-invite because it disables silence suppression. My guess is that your call is failing in the media stream. Send along your RTP streams for analysis.

Thanks,

 

Maciej Wasiel

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Software Engineer, Dialogic Research Inc | Address: 15 Crawford Street, Needham, MA 02494 | Phone: (781) 433 9771 | Mobile: (508) 740-2641 | Fax: (781) 433 9255  

Email: maciej.wasiel at dialogic.com

 

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Sijit Nair
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:57 AM
To: sijit.nair at gmail.com
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Fax Problem

 

Hi Friend 

 

We have fax problem with the below call flow. 

 

Customer 

 

FAX client---ISDN-----SIP

 

 

Vendor 

SIP---SS7---Fax destination


 

We have two trace with one with a sucess and one failed . We tried comparing the same but still not able to fine any difference on the trace. It will be a great help if any one can point me any issue in the signaling. 

 


-- 
Regards

SN


_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org --------------------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont adressés à l'attention exclusive de leurs destinataires et sont strictement confidentiels. Si vous le recevez par erreur, merci de le détruire après en avoir informé l'expéditeur sans délai. Toute divulgation, copie ou usage par une personne autre que son destinataire sont interdits. Maroc Telecom décline toute responsabilité pour toute altération, déformation ou falsification subie par le message au cours de sa transmission. Retrouvez toutes les informations de Maroc Telecom sur http://www.iam.ma
 ---------------------------------------------------
This message and its attachments are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and are strictly confidential. If you have received this in error, please delete the material from any computer after having informed the sender. Any copy or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. Maroc Telecom accepts no liability for any alteration, distortion or falsification that may occur during the transmission of this message. All information about Maroc Telecom on http://www.iam.ma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20110602/f0e61bef/attachment-0002.html>