[SIPForum-discussion] Call Forwarding
    RAMASAMY, KESAVAN (KESAVAN)** CTR ** 
    kesavan.ramasamy at alcatel-lucent.com
       
    Wed Aug 24 05:09:37 UTC 2011
    
    
  
Hi,
>From my point of view we will have User-B in To header.
Because this is the only way that User C can identify the call is forwarded from User-B.
Kesavan R
________________________________
From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Gopalakrishnan A.N
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 10:55 PM
To: Aysegul Donmez
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Call Forwarding
If i am not wrong. In the forwarded invite the To header will be C's user address. Any other inputs would be appreciated.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Aysegul Donmez <aysdonmez at yahoo.com<mailto:aysdonmez at yahoo.com>> wrote:
Hi,
At the call forwarding scenario:
User-A calls User-B. User-B forwards all incoming calls (call forwarding unconditional) to User-C.
First the INVITE message contains:
 *   Request URI: User-B
 *   To: User-B
 *   From: User-A
Then it changes to
 *   Request URI: User-C
 *   To: User-B or User-C
 *   From: User-A
 *   Diversion header: User-B
My question is does "To header" of the changed INVITE contains the forwarded user's number(User-C) of the called number(User-B)?
Thanks very much for your help,
Aysegul
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org<mailto:discussion at sipforum.org>
--
Thank you  with regards,
Gopalakrishnan A.N.
VoIP call - sip:saigop at gtalk2voip.com<mailto:sip%3Asaigop at gtalk2voip.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20110824/d17ab790/attachment-0002.html>
    
    
More information about the discussion
mailing list