[SIPForum-discussion] Is (200)Ok without Ringing (180, 183) a right approach?
vijay swami
vijay_wce at yahoo.co.in
Tue Sep 21 04:32:50 UTC 2010
Yes that is practical...I am dealing with Truefone server (used in USA). It hardly sends the 180 Ringing. Directly it sends 200 OK.
VIJAY
--- On Sat, 18/9/10, Sumanta Sen <sen.sumanta.mckv at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Sumanta Sen <sen.sumanta.mckv at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Is (200)Ok without Ringing (180, 183) a right approach?
To: "Sachin Parnami" <sachin.mobite at gmail.com>
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Date: Saturday, 18 September, 2010, 7:42 AM
Yes, you can have such call flows.....
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Sachin Parnami <sachin.mobite at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi *,
Is it a right approach to send Ok (200) without Ringing(180) or Session in Progress (183)? as these are provisional responses.
UE1 UE2
| INVITE |
|-------------------------------------------------->|
| TRYING (100) |
|<------------------------------------------------- |
| OK (200) |
|<--------------------------------------------------|
Does it abides standards of RFC 3261?
--
Regards,
Sachin Parnami
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100921/0837a58d/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list