[SIPForum-discussion] Delayed 302 Redirection

[Deepak Bhatia]

Hi Vijay,

 

Pls let me know your response. As I am studying RFC 3261 but the CISCO
document refers to RFC 2543.

 

Thanks

 

________________________________

From: Deepak Bhatia 
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:15 PM
To: 'Vijay Tiwari'
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] Delayed 302 Redirection

 

Hi Vinay,

 

Why don't we have CISCO links with RFC 3261 as base. All these are
available with RFC2543.

 

Do we have CISCO PDFs for SIP on RFC 3261 ?

 

Thanx

 

Deepak Bhatia

 

________________________________

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Vijay Tiwari
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 9:40 AM
To: Romaniuk, Maurice (Mo)
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Delayed 302 Redirection

 

Hello Mo

 

this is possiable. please go thourgh the given below link

 

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_programm
ing_reference_guide_chapter09186a0080087351.html

 

nitin and sam are right!!!

 

Thanks

Vijay

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Romaniuk, Maurice (Mo)
<romani at avaya.com> wrote:

Hi all,

 

Has anyone worked with delayed Redirection messages ie is it legal for a
UAS to send a delayed 302 redirect message AFTER provisional responses
have been received by the UAC? Example:

 

UAC                     UAS

Invite--------------------->

      <--------------------- 100 Trying

      <--------------------- 183 (with SDP) or 180 Ringing

      <--------------------- 302 Moved Temp

 

Cheers!

 

Mo

 

	Maurice "Mo" Romaniuk | ACE R&D Support | Avaya | 3500 Carling
Ave | Ottawa, Ontario Canada | 613-356-8381 | romani at avaya.com
<mailto:romani at avaya.com>  
	
	avaya.com <http://avaya.com/> 
	
	[ Please consider the environment before printing this email ]

 


_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org




-- 
They can because they think they can.




DISCLAIMER: 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and
intended 
for the named recipient(s) only.  
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NECHCL or its 
affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in  
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the 
opinions of NECHCL or its affiliates.  
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and / or publication of  
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is 
strictly prohibited. If you have  
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender 
immediately. . 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20101217/8667e3b8/attachment-0002.html>