[SIPForum-discussion] Delayed 302 Redirection

[Vijay Tiwari]

Hello Romani

its is not legal becasue if you are sending the request to  redirect server
then you could not recieved 183 or 180 ringing from server. or if your
server actting both proxy and redirect then also only one response allow
either 183 or 302.

Thanks
Vijay

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Romaniuk, Maurice (Mo) <romani at avaya.com>wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
> Has anyone worked with delayed Redirection messages ie is it legal for a
> UAS to send a delayed 302 redirect message AFTER provisional responses have
> been received by the UAC? Example:
>
> UAC                     UAS
> Invite--------------------->
>       <--------------------- 100 Trying
>       <--------------------- 183 (with SDP) or 180 Ringing
>       <--------------------- 302 Moved Temp
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mo
>
>
> *Maurice "Mo" Romaniuk* | ACE R&D Support | *Avaya* | 3500 Carling Ave | Ottawa,
> Ontario Canada | 613-356-8381 | romani at avaya.com
>
> avaya.com
>
> [ Please consider the environment before printing this email ]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>


-- 
They can because they think they can.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20101210/4e9e6bad/attachment-0002.html>