[SIPForum-discussion] 183 response code
mustafa aydin
mustafaydin82 at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 4 19:48:05 UTC 2010
Hi Jing,
In addition to Vivek`s comment; the client must send prack with SDP if the
invite has no offer;
RFC 3262;
If the UAC receives a reliable provisional response with an offer
(this would occur if the UAC sent an INVITE without an offer, in
which case the first reliable provisional response will contain the
offer), it MUST generate an answer in the PRACK. If the UAC receives
a reliable provisional response with an answer, it MAY generate an
additional offer in the PRACK. If the UAS receives a PRACK with an
offer, it MUST place the answer in the 2xx to the PRACK.
Regards,
Mustafa Aydin
________________________________
From: Vivek Batra <Vivek.Batra at matrixcomsec.com>
To: Jing Jiang <jjiang at biamp.com>; discussion at sipforum.org
Sent: Sat, December 4, 2010 6:14:32 AM
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] 183 response code
Hi,
Yes with PRACK if 100rel is used.
No if 100rel is not used.
Refer RFC 3262 for more details.
Best Regards,
Vivek Batra
From:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On
Behalf Of Jing Jiang
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 1:22 AM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] 183 response code
When 183 response message with SDP is received, should the client ack this
message?
Jing Jiang
________________________________
BIAMP SYSTEMS EMAIL NOTICE The information contained in this email and any
attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other
intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you
notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your
mail system.
________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20101204/c86a8e40/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list