[SIPForum-discussion] ACK is not sent of 407
sunilkumar.verma at wipro.com
sunilkumar.verma at wipro.com
Fri Apr 30 04:57:08 UTC 2010
Hi,
As per my knowledge the INVITE transaction is still not complete. As
this is non 2XX response hence ACK is part of transaction.
Considering this, the Proxy must reject the INVITE with 491 Request
Pending.
Regards
Sunil Verma
ESN: 877-5050
Ph: +919731245000
________________________________
From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of ankit agarwal
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:09 AM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] ACK is not sent of 407
Hi,
Can any one help me with one scenario:
Normal scenario:
A ------ (INVITE) ------> Proxy --------(INVITE)-------> B
A <------ (407)---------- Proxy <--------(407)---------- B
A ------ (ACK)---------> Proxy -----------(ACK)-------> B
A ------ (INVITE) ------> Proxy --------(INVITE)-------> B
A <------ (100)---------- Proxy <--------(100)---------- B
A <------ (180)---------- Proxy <--------(180)---------- B
A <------ (200)---------- Proxy <--------(200)---------- B
But if A don't send ACK of 407 then what proxy should do for INVITE with
cseq-2.
--
Ankit Agarwal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100430/739b188d/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list