[SIPForum-discussion] ACK is not sent of 407

sunilkumar.verma at wipro.com sunilkumar.verma at wipro.com
Fri Apr 30 04:57:08 UTC 2010


Hi,
 
As per my knowledge the INVITE transaction is still not complete. As
this is non 2XX response hence ACK is part of transaction.
Considering this, the Proxy must reject the INVITE with 491 Request
Pending.
 

Regards 
Sunil Verma 
ESN: 877-5050 
Ph: +919731245000 

 

________________________________

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of ankit agarwal
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:09 AM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] ACK is not sent of 407


Hi,

Can any one help me with one scenario:

Normal scenario:

A ------ (INVITE) ------> Proxy --------(INVITE)-------> B
A <------ (407)---------- Proxy <--------(407)---------- B
A ------ (ACK)---------> Proxy -----------(ACK)-------> B

A ------ (INVITE) ------> Proxy --------(INVITE)-------> B
A <------ (100)---------- Proxy <--------(100)---------- B
A <------ (180)---------- Proxy <--------(180)---------- B
A <------ (200)---------- Proxy <--------(200)---------- B


But if A don't send ACK of 407 then what proxy should do for INVITE with
cseq-2.

--
Ankit Agarwal



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100430/739b188d/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list