[SIPForum-discussion] Parsing SIP Request without From Header

Tomasz Zieleniewski tzieleniewski at gmail.com
Thu May 14 10:50:03 UTC 2009


Of course we have RFC 3261!!!!
SIP Stack has to be compliant with rules which define
the structure of SIP request and responses.
Though SIP Stack implementation always provides some level of abstraction,
this can imply that for instance some responses like 400 could be generated
automatically.

- Tomasz

2009/5/14 Keerthi <keerthivarmansrinivasan at gmail.com>

> Tomasz Zieleniewski wrote:
>
>> It depends on the Stack implementation:)
>>
>> 2009/5/14 Keerthi <keerthivarmansrinivasan at gmail.com <mailto:
>> keerthivarmansrinivasan at gmail.com>>
>>
>>    Thanks to all,
>>    I agree with your response.
>>    I want to know whether the SIP Stack will parse the received SIP
>>    Message or not?
>>
>>
>>
>>    AMIT ANAND wrote:
>>
>>
>>        Keerthi.
>>
>>        I belive UAS should send 400 BAD request., as FROM header is
>>        must for any request.
>>
>>        Thanks
>>        Amit
>>
>>        On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Keerthi
>>        <keerthivarmansrinivasan at gmail.com
>>        <mailto:keerthivarmansrinivasan at gmail.com>
>>        <mailto:keerthivarmansrinivasan at gmail.com
>>        <mailto:keerthivarmansrinivasan at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>           Hi All,
>>
>>           I need a clarification on parsing the SIP Request in sip stack.
>>           If the sip stack receives the REGISTER request without From
>>           Header. then
>>           the SIP Stack should throw an error message or should
>>        return a success
>>           SIP Message?
>>
>>           Please clarify   :-) ..
>>
>>           --
>>           Regards,
>>           Keerthi.
>>
>>           _______________________________________________
>>           This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>           TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>           http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>           Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>        <mailto:discussion at sipforum.org>
>>           <mailto:discussion at sipforum.org
>>        <mailto:discussion at sipforum.org>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    --    Regards,
>>    Keerthi.
>>
>>
>>  Thanks for your information. We dont have any standards for parsing the
> request and response?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Keerthi.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20090514/a86f52a4/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list