[SIPForum-discussion] Sigcomp & REGISTER refresh

Moshe Ostrovsky mosheo at radvision.com
Sun May 10 07:01:11 UTC 2009



It's better to compress the refresh, especially if you use the dynamic
compression (using RFC5049), since in this case you will achieve better
compression for each further message which passed via the certain

Anyway, the server/registrar which supports Sigcomp must be capable to
receive compressed and uncompressed messages on the same port and filter
them acc. to the bitmask. 


Best regards,

Moshe .


From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Ravichandra Singh
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 8:45 AM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Sigcomp & REGISTER refresh



I have a doubt regarding refresh REGISTER request
I am sending a sigcomp compressed REGISTER request. Now when I refresh
my REGISTER request should the reREGISTER request be sigcomp compressed?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20090510/c5cebccf/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the discussion mailing list