[SIPForum-discussion] could somebody tell me the final status ofthis Service-Route related draft? THANKS!!

[cow]

Thanks.

But from this piece of 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosenberg-sip-route-construct-02:

        ...
   Since RFC 3608 does not provide any normative
   behavior for combining service routes and outbound proxies, the hotel
   proxy cannot know what to do, thus causing the interoperability
   problem....wasn't the draft trying to propose something to solve the 
interop problems brought by RFC 3608?cnm
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Garron, James" <jgarron at sonusnet.com>
To: "cow" <cnmjbm at gmail.com>; <discussion at sipforum.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 6:43 AM
Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] could somebody tell me the final status 
ofthis Service-Route related draft? THANKS!!


Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension Header Field for Service
Route Discovery During Registration

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3608


-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of cow
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:32 PM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] could somebody tell me the final status
ofthis Service-Route related draft? THANKS!!

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosenberg-sip-route-construct-02