[SIPForum-discussion] INVITE without SDP and 1XX provisional answer with SDP

fråmedrëlay framedrelay at yahoo.com
Mon May 26 13:42:08 UTC 2008

route header ? 
If you get the answer, let us know, its an interesting scenario. :D


Jean-Sébastien Decubber <js.decubber at gmail.com> wrote: Dear All,

I am currently doing some interworking test between two CPE. For a very specific scenario I reach the following call flow:

1) User A sends an INVITE without SDP to user B.
2) User B answers with a 183 session progress with SDP. 
So user B wants to send early media, but at this stage it doesn't where to send it because user A doesn't send any SDP in the invite.
I know that PRACK mechanism can be used for this kind of scenario. But I would like to know if there is any RFC defining scenario? 
 If the user A doesn't put the 100 rel tag in the INVITE (meaning that it doesn't support PRACK), is user B allowed to send this 183 SP with SDP?

 Is there any "official way" to support this scenario (so I can try to know who is the guilty one)??
Thanks and regards,
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org

Cheersp.sylvester |-------------------------------------------------------------------* mail me : prasanthsylvester at hotmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080526/3c570036/attachment-0008.html>

More information about the discussion mailing list