[SIPForum-discussion] Regarding sequence of 1XX response

Niketa Pal pal.niketa at gmail.com
Fri May 23 11:28:32 UTC 2008


Hi Nishant,

Party B can send 183 Session in Progress response before 180 Ringing. There
is no such constraint in SIP to send 180 first n then 183.

Regards,
Niketa

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Roy, Nishant Kishore <nishantkr at hp.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have one call flow like ...
>
>  A               B
>  ----------INVITE-->
>  <---------183-----
>  <--some announcement will be played here ----->
>  ------PRACK------>
> <------200 ok for PRACK---
> <-----180 ringing -----
>
>
>
> Mu doubt comes over here can a party B send a 183 before 180 ..... I mean
> the 1xx response has to maintain in some sequence ?
>
>
>
>
> Regards
> Nishant
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080523/0bd6f12c/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list