[SIPForum-discussion] HELP

[Ganesh Bhattathiri]

Hi,

 

If both are correct in a case when the sip request travels through multiple
proxy servers before actually reaching destination , which of the two format
would be used?

 

Ganesh

 

  _____  

From: rajesh [mailto:rajeshkumar.r at imimobile.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:59 AM
To: Ganesh Bhattathiri
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] HELP

 

As per my knowledge both format correct.

can write in one via header seperated by " , " or can use multiple via field
.

 

Thanks and Regards
Rajesh Kumar
Sr. Software Engineer
R & D - Network Group 
+91 40 23555945 - 235
+91 99084 00027
www.imimobile.com 

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Ganesh Bhattathiri <mailto:ganesh_bhattathiri at persistent.co.in>  

To: discussion at sipforum.org 

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:22 AM

Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] HELP

 

Hi everyone,

 

Sorry to trouble again, I wanted to know if there are multiple via headers
in a sip request could the header be written in the following manner?

 

" Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
server10.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG4bK776asdhds;received=192.0.2.1, 

SIP/2.0/UDP server11.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG2fdK776asdhds;received=192.0.2.2
"

 

Or do we write  it as,

 

" Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
server10.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG4bK776asdhds;received=192.0.2.1 

   Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
server11.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG2fdK776asdhds;received=192.0.2.2 "

 

And if it is the later then is the first header format wrong? Or is it
possible to write the header in that format?

 

Awaiting reply.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Ganesh

 


  _____  


_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080516/1516ac3f/attachment-0002.html>