[SIPForum-discussion] SIP Trunking

[Chris Gatch]

The concept you are referring to was part of an early draft of the
SIPconnect Spec where a single parent account/DID was associated with
multiple child accounts.  All associated accounts share the same contact
info and authentication credentials.  This was dropped after
considerable debate.  The spec permits the behavior by saying the PBX
may register and the service provider MUST accept a REGISTER method from
a PBX.    This is the way probably 90% of SIPconnect Trunking
implementations work in the real world.  For example, Broadsoft's
business trunking feature on  their AS implements this capability.

 

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:33 PM
To: 'FRANCISCO GIOIA'; discussion at sipforum.org;
discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] SIP Trunking

 

It depends on the PBX.  Some require a b2bua whiles others have the
capability of registering either all the numbers or just a single number
and route based on the To header instead of the Request URI. 

 

 

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of FRANCISCO GIOIA
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 12:33 PM
To: 'discussion at sipforum.org'; 'discussion-bounces at sipforum.org'
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] SIP Trunking

 

Hi all ,

 

my name is Francisco and I need your help about :

 

Scenario :

 

One PBX who has a SIP Trunk  with a  Softswitch .

 

Doubt :

 

How can the PBX  register yours devices ? 



**********************************************************************
This email may contain confidential information. If you are not
the intended recipient, please advise by return email and delete
immediately without reading or forwarding to others.
 -- Cbeyond 
**********************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080609/a2f0e5f3/attachment-0002.html>