[SIPForum-discussion] About via-received parameter...

[prince.philip at aricent.com]

Very much, for NAT traversal support.

Thanks & Regards,
Prince




Kaushik V Shah <kaushik at ncoretech.com> 
01/16/2008 04:09 PM


To
Prince Arimboor Philip/BLR/HSS at HSS
cc
discussion at sipforum.org, discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
Subject
Re: [SIPForum-discussion] About via-received parameter...






Thanks Prince.
And while we are on this topic,
is it okay to assume 3581 support mandatory for clients / proxies 
compliant to 3261?

Regards,
Kaushik

prince.philip at aricent.com wrote:

>
> Refer RFC-3581
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Prince
>
>
>
> *Kaushik V Shah <kaushik at ncoretech.com>*
> Sent by: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
>
> 01/16/2008 03:43 PM
>
> 
> To
>                discussion at sipforum.org
> cc
> 
> Subject
>                [SIPForum-discussion] About via-received parameter...
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell why "received=" parameter of Via header contains only
> IP address and not the port?
> Is it possible to add port to "received=" parameter?
>
> If this discussion has already happened, can someone point me to that.
> Or has there been an amendment re this in later RFCs?
>
> Regards,
> Kaushik
>
> The information contained in this electronic message and any 
> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the 
> addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged 
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
> immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments 
> contained in it.
>
> Contact your Administrator for further information.
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit 
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
>
> ***********************  Aricent- Confidential   ***********************
>
>"DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended 
solely for the use of 
>the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or 
confidential information and should not be 
>circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If 
you have received this message in error, 
>please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that you are strictly
>prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of 
this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for 
>loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by 
this email including damage from virus."
> 
>


The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments 
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and 
may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you 
are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or 
copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all 
copies of this message and any attachments contained in it.

Contact your Administrator for further information.



***********************  Aricent- Confidential   ***********************
"DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be 
circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, 
please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly
prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for 
loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080116/7fd9b273/attachment-0002.html>