[SIPForum-discussion] SIP Response 520

mjhorse mjhorse at qq.com
Tue Apr 29 13:25:54 UTC 2008


Hi
 I don't look into this draft, but what I'm concerned with is how to determine whether a reason code is used or not? As I think 520/503/507 is the same if we just want define a new failling situation, how can I tell if I want to define some for my own design? Or I use a code arbitrarily only take into account its category(1xx-6xx, I mean)?

  
  
 ------------------
  by mj

  
  
 ------------------ Original ------------------
  From:  "herve jourdain"<herve.jourdain at mstarsemi.com>;
 Date:  Tue, Apr 29, 2008 08:44 PM
 To:  "'Amit Pendse'"<amit.v.pendse at gmail.com>; "discussion"<discussion at sipforum.org>; 
 
 Subject:  Re: [SIPForum-discussion] SIP Response 520

  
   
Hi,
 
 
 
I think the use of this response code was abandoned in the latest draft (draft-hilt-sipping-overload-04)…
 
Overload now seems to use 503 or 507, and the oc parameter, to indicate congestion.
 
 
 
Regards,
 
 
 
Herve
 
 
   
 
 
From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Amit Pendse
Sent: mardi 29 avril 2008 13:57
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] SIP Response 520

 
 
 

A SIP server that rejects a request because of overload MUST reject this request with a 520 response code. 520 is a new SIP response code defined. This response code is used for requests that are rejected because the SIP server has received an indication that its downstream neighbor is overloaded or because the SIP server itself is under overload.

-- 
Amit Pendse
System Engineer 
No. 403 & 404, 4th Floor,
Wiekfield IT City Infotech, Nagar Road,
Pune-411014 , India
Mobile : +91-9823640764
Phone (O): 91-020-39846100 Extn: 384 
"Building future, with the foundation of present and experience of past"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080429/fc33ba1d/attachment-0014.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list