[SIPForum-discussion] Bye request

[mjhorse]

Hi
 I made a mistake and thanks for all you guys' reminding
 I think it's CANCEL that is hop-by-hop under any situation not BYE, right?
 As well as 4xx failling responses??
  
  
 ------------------
  by mj

  
  
 ------------------ Original ------------------
  From:  "JAYESH"<thesweethuman at yahoo.co.in>;
 Date:  Thu, Apr 24, 2008 10:52 PM
 To:  "mjhorse"<mjhorse at qq.com>; 
 
 Subject:  Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Bye request

  
  With the record route header ALL signalling that has to go will always have to traverse the Signaling proxy server as inserted in the record route field, BYE also forms a part of the signaling code, for many systems which do billing, BYE will signify the end of the call time & hence the billing will depend upon it, 
 so BYE will always traverse the record route IP's, 

mjhorse <mjhorse at qq.com> wrote:
  Hi
 In my point of view, BYE will always be hop-by-hop regardless whether Route-Record is inserted in INVITE or under other conditions.
  
  
 ------------------
  by mj

  
  
 ------------------ Original ------------------
  From:  "mwilliam prusty"<callwilliam90653 at rediffmail.com>;
 Date:  Thu, Apr 24, 2008 02:40 PM
 To:  "discussion"<discussion at sipforum.org>; 
 
 Subject:  [SIPForum-discussion] Bye request

  
  
Hi 

Can any one tell , if proxy Inserts Recordroute header field in the invite request  of a call , In this case the BYE request will be Hop by hop or End to End.



Regards
William 


    

_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org

 
 
 
Bollywood, fun, friendship, sports and more. You name it, we have it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080425/db4e95ab/attachment-0002.html>