[SIPForum-discussion] FW: re-invite versus update

[mishra.abhishek at wipro.com]

F YI 

________________________________

 re-INVITEs are still important ..
 Some reasons below:
 
1. http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping/current/msg11481.html
 Please check out this email exchange. 
 
 A.B. Nataraju has explained that re-INVITE still has an upper hand over
UPDATE as it ensures that the offer-answer is completed with its
three-way handshake
 This reasoning sounds good to me too.
 
2. http://130.230.52.14/list-archive/sip/msg03708.html
re-INVITEs are still needed. In 3pcc scenarios it is often needed to
send an empty re-INVITE in order to get an offer in the response.

Please direct us to the website where this debate is on ? Were there any
responses to Thomas's mail below.?
 
Thanks,
Best Regards,
Rekha
(ESN : 6-877-5834)
(PSTN : 81168)
 

________________________________

________________________________

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Tom Cross
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:54 PM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] re-invite versus update



Hi,

 

Is re-invite dead?

 

I still see it but I am in a class and says that everyone uses UPDATE.

 

Cheers,

 

Thomas B. Cross - 303-594-1694

Add thoughts to CrossTalk blog on TMCnet -
http://blog.tmcnet.com/cross-talk/

 

See all the new Digital Communications, VoIP, SIP and Advanced Network
courses at:

http://www.techtionary.com <http://www.techtionary.com> 

The World's Largest Animated Library on TECHnology 

Web Hosting Magazine's Editor's Choice For Technical Help

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070927/42215ceb/attachment-0002.html>