[SIPForum-discussion] CSeq in re-Invite

anurag gupta anurgupta at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 9 13:31:52 UTC 2007


Hi
  
  The RE-INVITE is generated from the callee side, so it can send any  CSeq in its generated INVITE or any other message. But if the Re-INVITe  is generated from the caller's end, then CSeq should be incremented.
  
  Regards
  Anurag

Shankar Manickam <smanickam at velankani.com> wrote:                                    Hi All,
    I am not seeing that cseq gets incremented for Call hold  in the given link
    http://tech-invite.com/Ti-sip-service-1.html
     
    Is there any special condition to get it?
     
     
        With regards,
    Shankar.
    
    -----Original Message-----
  From: S Selvakumar-VPFR47  [mailto:VPFR47 at motorola.com] 
  Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007  9:03 PM
  To: Shankar Manickam;  discussion at sipforum.org
  Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion]  CSeq in re-Invite
     
    Hi Shankar,
     
     
    Try a Call Hold scenario, where you  can find Cseq gets incremented for Hold Invite and UnHold Invite
         
    
    regards
    Selva
         
    
     
        
---------------------------------
    
    From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org  [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On  Behalf Of Shankar Manickam
  Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007  3:38 PM
  To: discussion at sipforum.org
  Subject: [SIPForum-discussion]  CSeq in re-Invite
    Hi,
          Is there any situation where cseq will get incremented for re-Invite?
     
     
    With Regards,
    Shankar Manickam
     
    
    _______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org


       
---------------------------------
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20071009/a69d403b/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list