[SIPForum-discussion] CSeq in re-Invite

Shiv shiv.kumr at gmail.com
Fri Oct 5 11:51:25 UTC 2007


  I suppose, three re-invite will be involved for the same dialog on
scenario like : a. hold  b. conecting to Music c. connecting back to the
endpoint, Since it is same dialog, Cseq will be incremented.




On 10/5/07, darshan b n <bn.darshan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Call hold feature where u can find re-invite with cseq : incremented
>
> Regards
> darshan b n
>
>
>  On 05/10/2007, Radhashyam Behera <radhashyambehera at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In  case of re-Invite CSeq needs to be incremented always for the same
> > Dialog.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Radhashyam
> >
> >  On 10/5/07, Shankar Manickam < smanickam at velankani.com> wrote:
> >
> > >   Hi,
> > >
> > >      Is there any situation where cseq will get incremented for
> > > re-Invite?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *With Regards,*
> > >
> > > *Shankar Manickam*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> > > http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> > > Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> > http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> > Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Darshan B N
>
> Thanks & Regards
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>


-- 
With best regards,
Sivakumar Arumugam
+91-9282419188
Alcatel-Lucent.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20071005/059a2d94/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list