[SIPForum-discussion] 302 message question

[sreekant nair]

Check out this link. 
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/rel_docs/sip_flo/hennigan.htm

There is a call flow depicting the messaging for a scenario where a 3XX response is received after a 183 is sent by the server. I guess that explains how CISCO supports it. But yeah I need to dig deeper to find an RFC that states this. 

Regards
Sreekant

----- Original Message ----
From: Mihaly Zachar <zmihaly at madein.hu>
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2007 12:07:10 PM
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] 302 message question

Hi all,

I'm writing an UAS.

The UAS has a feature, that if the called number is matching with a 
pattern, it will send 183 Session in progress, than plays an RTP stream 
and then redirect the UAC with 302 Moved Temporarily..

There is an UAC, and it's developers says that I should not send 302 
Redirect after the 183 Session in progress.

This solution works well with CISCO media gateways.

I can't find it in the RFC 3261 who has the truth..

Can sy help me in this ?


So, the call flow is the following:

UAC                      UAS
      --- INVITE --->
      <--- 100 ------
      <--- 183 ------
      <-- RTP --
           .
           .
           .
      <--- 302 ----


Is this correct ?


Thanks,
Misi
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org







       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20071002/84d7eb88/attachment-0002.html>