[SIPForum-discussion] Relation b/w SIP and IMS

[alexzhang at gdnt.com.cn]

I think Adi's asking why IMS is selecting SIP as its singlling protocol.


________________________________

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of DEEPAK SHARMA
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 4:15 PM
To: aditya kumar
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Relation b/w SIP and IMS


Hi Aditya,

You are comparing tow non-comparable terms.
IMS is a terminology and SIP is the Signaling Application protocol being
used in IMS.

IMS is general architecture to be used for IP networks.Whole networks
deals its signaling on SIP. 



On Nov 22, 2007 8:30 PM, aditya kumar <adityaakumar at hotmail.com> wrote:


	Hi guys,
	 
	1.If IMS is working on SIP protocol then what's the
disadvantage/doesn't support the features by SIP, so that we have to go
for IMS?
	2.How IMS brings a great flexibility in our near feature?
	 
	Please guide me.
	 
	Thanks,
	Adi
	

________________________________

	Live the life in style with MSN Lifestyle. Check out! Try it
now! <http://content.msn.co.in/Lifestyle/Default> 

	_______________________________________________
	This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
	TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
	Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
	
	




-- 
Thanks 
Deepak Sharma 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20071123/f540df08/attachment-0002.html>