[SIPForum-discussion] Diversion Header
Siva M-Q16748
sivam at motorola.com
Tue May 29 11:31:45 UTC 2007
I see that in case A , B , C are sip users and B has forwarded to C ,
the INVITE sent to C has TO and Diversion header value as B
Siva M
________________________________
From: resalath ahamed [mailto:resalath.ahamed at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 4:59 PM
To: Siva M-Q16748
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Diversion Header
have u come across any case where the diversion header is used bet'n SIP
users ... I have worked on Diversion header for Interworking scenarios
only ... i.e. form a SIP to SS7 or ISDN and vice versa ... will try to
find out bout u r ques !!!
On 5/29/07, Siva M-Q16748 <sivam at motorola.com> wrote:
Thanks
Is there some case where the diversion header and To values
would be different and both would be registered SIP users .
Siva M
________________________________
From: resalath ahamed [mailto:resalath.ahamed at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:52 PM
To: Siva M-Q16748
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Diversion Header
SS7 to SIP interworking scenario.
If the IAM contains the redirection number, original called
number and called number parameters then for the SIP invite, redirection
and original called number will be mapped to diversion and called number
will be mapped to TO header and R-URI.
I hope i have recollected correctly..
Please correct me if i am wrong !!!
On 5/29/07, Siva M-Q16748 < sivam at motorola.com
<mailto:sivam at motorola.com> > wrote:
Hi
Is there any scenario in which the sip uri in diversion
header in INVITE will be different than that of the sip uri in TO header
Thanks
Siva M
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please
visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
--
Thanks and regards,
Resalath Ahamed.
--
Thanks and regards,
Resalath Ahamed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070529/d45491c4/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list