[SIPForum-discussion] tel URI

[Stastny Richard]

I wonder

 

1.	;user= is a sip parameter
2.	:postd= I do not find in RFC3966

 

Richard

 

________________________________

From: Xia, Zeng Wu (Jackey) [mailto:zxia at alcatel-lucent.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:02 AM
To: Stastny Richard; aditya kumar; discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] tel URI

 

Richard,

 

 The RFC3966 think the 

  INVITE tel:+358-555-1234567;postd=pp22 at foo.com;user=phone 

   is valid.

Regards

Jackey 

 

	
________________________________


	From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Stastny Richard
	Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:27 PM
	To: aditya kumar; discussion at sipforum.org
	Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] tel URI

	>INVITE tel:+358-555-1234567;postd=pp22 at foo.com;user=phone

	 

	This is an invalid format

	You may either use

	Sip:+358-555-1234567 at foo.com;user=phone
	or

	Tel:+358-555-1234567

	
	postd=pp22 is not allowed anymore in the tel URI

	 

	Richard

	 

	
________________________________


	From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of aditya kumar
	Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:48 AM
	To: discussion at sipforum.org
	Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] tel URI

	 

	Hi,
	 
	Can we send tel URI in the  INVITE req.,if not why ?
	 
	Example:-
	INVITE tel:+358-555-1234567;postd=pp22 at foo.com;user=phone
	 
	Thanks,
	Aditya

	
________________________________


	The idiot box is no longer passe; It's making news and how!
<http://content.msn.co.in/Entertainment/TV/Default.aspx> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070523/8b324437/attachment-0002.html>