[SIPForum-discussion] About 423 response in RFC-3265

[hemanth kumar]

Hi,
   
  422 was specific to session timers.
  423 would be the ideal one.
   
  Regards
  Hemanth

¹Å Ã÷· <ggmylove at hotmail.com> wrote:
  Hi friends ,
I am mazed that 423 response in RFC-3265. There are "423 Interval too 
small" and "423 Subscription Too Brief" in the document. But in 
RFC-3261,the definition is "423 Interval Too Brief ".
Is there anyone can tell me,the 423 response in RFC-3265 should be "423 
Interval Too Brief " in RFC-3261, or "422 Session Interval Too Small" in 
RFC-4028 ?

Regards
Minglu Gu

_________________________________________________________________
ÓëÁª»úµÄÅóÓѽøÐн»Á÷£¬ÇëʹÓà MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/cn 

_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org



********************************************************************* 
Chenji Hemanth Kumar 
Wipro Technologies
Ph: 23404007 
*********************************************************************



 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070109/2c4771d8/attachment-0002.html>