[SIPForum-discussion] [Sip] SIPit 20 survey summary
Henning Schulzrinne
hgs at cs.columbia.edu
Sun Apr 29 13:58:31 UTC 2007
For the record, I will note that I have made proposals for simple non-
multipart location conveyance (using the data: URL), but various
process-related arguments were made as to why we weren't allowed to
look at that. (I'd prefer even simpler solutions, such as the one
that XMPP uses, but that's beyond the political correctness limit in
GEOPRIV.)
I tend to agree that exhortations to developers generally achieve
little. On the other hand, I'm not sure that belly-aching about
multipart is all that helpful. After all, most email clients support
it and there are libraries in various languages to help with
implementation. Generating multipart bodies is pretty trivial (as
opposed to parsing them), and that's all embedded devices will
generally have to do for location conveyance.
On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:36 AM, Jeroen van Bemmel wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
>
> I was responding to Brian's message. He basically says: SIPit
> results show that the mechanisms needed to implement location
> conveyance are not widely implemented yet, we need to tell
> implementors to hurry it up
>
> I question whether that approach works, and turn it around by
> asking: why are these mechanisms not implemented widely?
>
> Personally I believe a significant part of the answer lies in the
> complexity of the proposed mechanisms, architecure, etc. So instead
> of trying to push the market to adopt the solution that is now on
> the table, perhaps we should look into what we can do to lower the
> barriers for adoption
>
> Regards,
> Jeroen
>
More information about the discussion
mailing list