[SIPForum-discussion] SBC or STUN/TURN Server ?

[김현곤]

Dear All,

 

I’m using a commercial Session Border Controller.

BUT, I have some performance problem with that SBC.

When a network went down and up again, the UAs (about 10,000 UAs) tried to
register simultaneously.

That makes the SBC fail to deal with the 1200 packets per second.

 

So, I asked the vendor to provide any solution for that problem,

BUT, I think they must take some time to fix that problem.

 

I should take alternative solution like the using of STUN server for NAT
traversal.

(I think that STUN server could be configured in a cluster for load sharing)

BUT, I can’t find any commercial STUN server and can’t find any other
operators using STUN server..

 

If you have some ideas on this, please let me know what I should do.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Peter, KIM

 

  _____  

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-
bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Ilya Borin
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 6:50 PM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] reSIProcate stack question

 

Hello !

I'm performing an analyzation of different SIP stacks for the product our
conpany intends to develop.
One of which is the reSIProcate. Which seems relly good :)

The problem is that the operation system we use is VxWorks.

And as I've understood, you don't have support for this OS.

 

The question is, if you know some way to compile and use it under VxWorks ?
I'll appresiate very much, if you'll give me an answer, even it it's
negative!

 

Thank you in advance !


-- 
Ilya Borin 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20060205/198ad886/attachment-0001.html>