[SIPForum-discussion] There are normal RFC for SIP INFO

[Burger, Eric]

Read Section 1 of KPML, and you can search the SIPPING list for DTMF and INFO.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sora Akash [mailto:sorakash at ybb.ne.jp]
Sent:	Tue Apr 11 18:30:57 2006
To:	Burger, Eric; yh h
Cc:	discussion at sipforum.org
Subject:	Re: [SIPForum-discussion] There are normal RFC for SIP INFO

any guidelines on why we should not use INFO for DTMF?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Burger, Eric" <EBurger at cantata.com>
To: "yh h" <yxhansome at yahoo.com.cn>
Cc: <discussion at sipforum.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:55 AM
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] There are normal RFC for SIP INFO


> If you need to transport DTMF in the signaling channel, for example, if
> you are using the DTMF for signaling, use KPML:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-kpml-07.txt
> 
> No, it is not expired; it is on the RFC Editor Queue. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:57:50 +0200
> From: Hisham Khartabil <hisham.khartabil at telio.no>
> Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] There are normal RFC for SIP INFO
> transferring DTMF?
> To: yh h <yxhansome at yahoo.com.cn>
> Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
> Message-ID: <0f24c9ebba4e1f8dba07245fa1419d22 at telio.no>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=HZ-GB-2312; format=flowed
> 
> Please do not use INFO for carrying DTMF. Use RFC2833.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hisham
> 
> On Apr 1, 2006, at 6:30 AM, yh h wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Any help is appreciated.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion at sipforum.org
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20060411/28b80d76/attachment-0001.html>