[SIPForum-discussion] INFO method
Greier, Tom
tom.greier at intel.com
Sun Sep 18 14:23:20 UTC 2005
Wouldn't a RE-INVITE be used for keep-alive?
________________________________
From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois
Beaulieu
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 9:59 AM
To: An open list for discussion of SIP-related topics
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] INFO method
Info messages are usually use as keep alive for any active call !! :)
----- Original Message -----
From: Darko Milic <mailto:darmil at neobee.net>
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 4:05 AM
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] INFO method
Hi all,
I am curious about usage of INFO method. Actually, I need
advice. I haven't noticed any practical solution that uses this method
yet. Like it's not popular method for using today. Maybe I am wrong, but
I have feeling that MESSAGE within dialog could do the same job;
exchange signaling information among parties.
My intention is to send some additional signaling information
important for upper application immediately after SIP dialog (with
INVITE) has been opened. Questions are: What should I use? What is the
preferable method today for such things? Is there some RFC that obsolete
RFC 2976 (INFO)?
Regards,
Darko
________________________________
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion at sipforum.org
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20050918/48c11a34/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list